Altho I predicted the city's election results with uncanny precision, the vote totals tell the real story.
Choosing Worrell for mayor was a vote for a steady Eddy in hard times. Burkett, who tried to portray himmself as a Cappuccilli clone almost didn't beat McIntyre. He must be feeling bad. Cappy might be feeling worse because no one would portray him as a longtime Worrell ally.
Iacoangeli's loss was noteworthy because he had all the endorsements you're supposed to have to swing an election. It just didn't swing and the faction smell probably didn't do him any more good than it did Burkett. It would have been a far more interesting race if three of the candidates hadn't cluttered it up.
Clark's Pct. 1 win was by a wider margin than I thought. I guess Edison's clout in town is slipping.
Paisley's win in Pct. 2 looks like a stunner at first glance. But if you look closer, he got the fewest votes of any of the winners. That's not a good sign for an incumbent and if he wasn't in a three-way race, he easily could have been a loser.
McGhee in 3 was a stunner. He was unopposed, but he got the most votes of anybody. This should be an interesting seat to watch.
Molenda in 4 also benefitted from the fed-up with factions movement. He'll probably bring a lot to the board.
Conner in 5 was a given. She'll be great if she stays out of earshot of bad influences.
Beneteau did really well in gathering votes in 6 considering he's an unopposed incumbent.
This has the makings of a pretty powerful lineup. I think I see the ready-made makings of a Worrell majority -- Clark, Molenda, McGhee and maybe Beneteau for starters.