Hosing the firefighters

There's been more rumors than info in the spat over the city firefighters contract.
I can see the logic on both sides of the argument, but nobody's going to win in this one. Too bad. It doesn't have to be that way.
Let's pretend the firefighters aren't involved and the city isn't Monroe.
Basically what we have is an employer with a collective bargaining agreement who doesn't think he has enough money to pay all his employees at the going rate. The choice is either to cut staff selectively or cut pay across the board.
If the employees were bargaining for a new contract, this would be fully understandable. Each side postures so in the end they both feel like they won something even though they also might have given up something.
I'm not defending the firefighters or the city.
The problem is that regardless of how greedy or overpaid anyone thinks the firefighters are, THE CITY AGREED TO THE CURRENT CONTRACT ABOUT NINE MONTHS AGO AND IT'S A MULTIYEAR CONTRACT.
Seems to me that everyone in the city knew finances were about to get tighter but at the time the contract with the firefighters was a good idea because of the precedents it set.
Now suddenly it's not a good idea anymore because the city suddenly can't afford it.
Given the city's decision to force a contract on the disorganized COMEA union, it seems like they're getting advice from a professional union-buster.
The union-buster, Jim Green, is accountable to no one. His job is to go around the state and try to screw public employee unions. Every public employer knows he will try to do that in good times or bad. (He had a traumatic experience during a Labor Day parade as a youth).
With the present state of the economy, it's a fine time for him and others like him to do their work. If you're unemployed and paying taxes, you kind of resent seeing your tax bill go up and someone still working who makes more than you do.
It really doesn't matter if that person is a firefighter or not, its just human nature.
Suppose some firefighters are fat, lazy, overpaid and bleed the city for overtime pay.
There are employees like that in any organization.
The problem is that by listening to a behind-the-scenes manipulator who appeals to their baser instincts, the city leadership is undercutting the collective bargaining process that has existed in the city for years, whether times were good or bad. Someone like mayor Mark Worrell, who seems to be a likeable and fair-minded guy, was a teacher represented by the teacher's union. Even if he didn't believe he should have been represented by a union, he probably took the pay raises the union negotiated and probably would be upset if someone wanted to reopen his contract.
Yet that's what he's condoning in these "talks" with the firefighters.
Here's what he and council should do. They should stick with the terms of the contract that they bargained for and signed in good faith and work on developing the framework for the next contract. Maintain the integrity of the collective bargaining process because no matter what fancy lawyer might advise them to the contrary, they have a signed and enforceable current legal contract with the firefighters.
This process could cost the city far more, namely distrust of city council (any city council) on the part of all city employees, unionized or not.
To suggest that easier and less high profile cuts can't be found elsewhere in the city is a joke. The city fire department is not the only big waste of money in the city of Monroe and might not be the biggest waste by a long shot.
Besides that, paybacks are hell. Either the city will find itself with a big liability problem due to staffing cuts or come election time what's left of big labor will light a fire under the seat of the present council. If they hang together now, they'll all hang together later.